using the arrow buttons.
by clicking on the page.
the page around when zoomed in by dragging it.
the zoom using the slider when zoomed-in.
by clicking on the zoomed-in page.
by entering text in the search field, and select "This Issue" or "All Issues"
by clicking on thumbnails to select pages, and then press the print button.
displays sections with thumbnails and descriptions.
displays a slider of thumbnails. Click on a page to jump.
allows you to browse the full archive.
about your subscription?
Lions Roar : November 2015
Queer Eye, Right View MINAL HAJRATWALA on seeing suffering clearly. THE QUEER EYE sees what it’s not supposed to: alluring curve of hip or neck on the wrong type of body, band of colored light in a thundercloud, rain bowing like a bodhisattva’s back. Likewise, the Dhammapada tells us that the wise see with the inner eye. This secret eye is how we grasp the wheel of dharma, which turns and turns despite whatever sensation we might have of being stuck. (Say, in the closet.) The Venerable Ajahn Chah urged us to observe nature and the cycles of nature: “Having arisen, all things change and die.” Don’t get lost in moods, in attachments and aversions. Supreme Court this, homophobia that. As LGBTIQ people we have become skilled at nonattachment. We uproot our clinging to familial acceptance, to hometowns too small to hold our view of the multiverse, to gender assignments at birth, to the well-worn paths of compulsory marriage. But if queerness becomes mainstream, what will happen to queer sanghas, to the queer eye itself? No fear; the dharma points the way. Ajahn Chah again: “Different people establish different conventions about what’s right and what’s wrong, but the Buddha took suffering as his guideline.” We must turn our collective queer eye to where the suffering is. In June 1969, a group fought back against the police outside the Stonewall Inn in New York City. At that moment, a queer rights movement was born, as Sylvia Rivera, Storme DeLarverie, and others declared “enough” and demanded the opening of eyes. On the forty-sixth anniversary of Stonewall, same-sex marriage—an agenda set and fought for by a largely white gay American movement—scored a major victory. Some of us celebrated at the White House. At the same moment, transgender and immigration activist Jennicet Gutiérrez, inside the White House, honored her Stonewall ancestors by protesting trans deportations. Amid a hissing crowd of mostly white respectable gays, she demanded that we open our eyes to a part of our community whose suffering remains deep and unresolved. As the dharma eye teaches us, we cannot cling to a fixed path. A movement that ossifies will change and die. Will we attach ourselves to the politics of respectability, or will we shed it as we’ve learned to shed the genders, faiths, and expectations we were born into? Will we seek approval from the eight worldly winds, or will we honor the wild, messy truths that we apprehend with our innermost gaze? How Far We’ve Come Actor and social-media king GEORGE TAKEI tells how Arnold Schwarzenegger’s hypocrisy compelled him to come out. MY FATHER was Zen and my mother was Shin, but there wasn’t much discussion of Buddhism until we came out of an internment camp at the end of World War II. As a child, I remember hearing the metaphor of the vastness of the ocean— we are all part of it, we belong to this vast oneness—and that made a lot of sense to me. Inspired by Dr. Martin Luther King, I became an activist for social justice and civil rights but was silent about the issue closest to me. I was a fledgling actor and it would have been career suicide for me to be “out.” I couldn’t even let my guard down at gay bars, knowing I’d have to slip out if there was any word of a raid. MINAL HAJRATWALA’s latest book is Bountiful Instructions for Enlightenment, published by The (Great) Indian Poetry Collective. * * * SHAMBHALA SUN NOVEMBER 2015 41