using the arrow buttons.
by clicking on the page.
the page around when zoomed in by dragging it.
the zoom using the slider when zoomed-in.
by clicking on the zoomed-in page.
by entering text in the search field, and select "This Issue" or "All Issues"
by clicking on thumbnails to select pages, and then press the print button.
displays sections with thumbnails and descriptions.
displays a slider of thumbnails. Click on a page to jump.
allows you to browse the full archive.
about your subscription?
Lions Roar : November 2017
MELVIN MCLEOD: Your new book, Why Buddhism Is True: The Science and Philosophy of Meditation and Enlightenment, is getting more mainstream attention than any other Buddhist- oriented book I can think of. Were you consciously trying to reach people who would normally turn their nose up at a book about Buddhism? ROBERT WRIGHT: I wanted to show people that the Bud- dhist diagnosis makes sense from a modern point of view. It is compatible in many ways with modern psychology and evolu- tionary psychology. It makes perfect sense in light of the mod- ern understanding of the evolutionary process that created us. There are many people who are resistant to Buddhism—per- haps because they think it’s unscientific. I hope my trying to place the practice, philosophy, and psychology of Buddhism in the context of modern science will help make it more credible in the eyes of people who are currently suspicious of it. Tell us about your background as a Buddhist practitioner. Since college I tried to meditate every once in a while, but I never had what I considered success. Finally, in 2003, I went to a one- week silent meditation retreat at the Insight Meditation Society in Massachusetts. That kind of flipped the switch. By the end of the week I felt much more appreciative of beauty, much less judge- mental, and much calmer. I did another retreat in 2009, and since then I have been pretty consistent in my mindfulness practice. So what have you discovered that Buddhism is right about? In 1994, I wrote a book about evolutionary psychology called The Moral Animal. That project convinced me that natural se- lection did not design us to be lastingly happy. It did not design us to always see the world clearly. In fact, evolutionary theory predicts that if certain illusions help genes get into the next generation, then those illusions—about the nature of the self, and about other people and other things—will be favoured by natural selection. In my study of evolutionary psychology, I came to appreciate three things about the human condition: that, by its nature, happiness tends to evaporate; that in many ways we don’t see ourselves or the world clearly; and that, by nature, we are not always morally good, even though we’re good at deceiving our- selves into thinking we’re moral people. Buddhism claims that these three things are connected. It says the reason we suffer, the reason we’re not enduringly satis- fied, is that we don’t see the world clearly. That’s also the reason we sometimes fall short of moral goodness and treat other hu- man beings badly. I was naturally interested in this proposition, given my background in evolutionary psychology. What I’m arguing in this book is that looking at Buddhism through the lenses of modern psychology—and evolutionary psychology specifically—tends to validate Buddhism’s claims. When we look at the subtle ways natural selection has built il- lusion into us, that tracks the two most fundamental Buddhist Why Buddhism is True Darwin and the Buddha agree on the problem, says evolutionary psychologist ROBERT WRIGHT. The Buddha solved it. LION’S ROAR | NOVEMBER 2017 40