using the arrow buttons.
by clicking on the page.
the page around when zoomed in by dragging it.
the zoom using the slider when zoomed-in.
by clicking on the zoomed-in page.
by entering text in the search field, and select "This Issue" or "All Issues"
by clicking on thumbnails to select pages, and then press the print button.
displays sections with thumbnails and descriptions.
displays a slider of thumbnails. Click on a page to jump.
allows you to browse the full archive.
about your subscription?
Lions Roar : May 2019
PHOTOBYMICHAELSTONE Roshi Pat Enkyo O’Hara is abbot of the Village Zendo in New York and a founding teacher of the Zen Peacemaker Family. She is the author of Most Intimate: A Zen Approach to Life’s Challenges. guage, and our rules give notice to anyone “differ- ent” that they are not really welcome, that they are not really a part of our communities, our families, and our lives. How does this happen, even in the most openhearted Buddhist communities? How is it that we unconsciously create an “other”—some- one who does not fit into our idea of what’s acceptable? How can we become aware enough in order to examine our ideas of “other” so we contribute to co-creating a world without an “other” at all? Our noisy minds can be acti- vated when we are confronted with unconventional pronouns or with requests for accommodation to unfamiliar ways of being. We can easily become confused and reac- tive, falling back on old, received ideas from a society that has upheld discrimination and preju- dice—a society that abhors differ- ence from the norm. It’s almost as if the voices of the past are speak- ing in our minds, saying, “This is other, this is wrong,” or “You’re not doing gender the way I’ve always thought about it,” or “That’s not a real marriage.” And yet, if we can quiet that noisy reactivity it’s likely we’ll recognize the irrationality of our unconscious bias—that we’ll remember that all beings are of the nature of waking up, of buddha. The trick is to stop for a moment and listen to our whole being, our fireflies, and then look at the one we think of as “other.” Emmanuel Levinas, the Lithuanian-Jewish French Philosopher, wrote so poignantly on encountering the face of another: “The first word of the face is the ‘thou shalt not kill.’ It is an order. There is a commandment in the appearance of the face...at the same time, the face of the other is destitute; it is the poor for whom I can do all and to whom I owe all.” When we look into the actual face of the other—not our received ideas or our fears, but simply the human face of the other—we recognize our common humanity. When we drop our noisy thinking and sim- ply stop and behold the other, however we may perceive that other as different, we recognize our relationship as fellow beings in this world at this time. We recognize not just our relationship, but our interrelationship—our sharing in the world of life itself. Or, as Buddhist teachings have it, the interconnected reality of the web of life. Simply put, we must wake up! It is not diffi- cult, once we recognize the hidden bias and sense of privilege that hovers below the surface of our minds. As Buddhist practitioners, we can use our techniques of meditation, study, and chant- ing to help us open our understanding. And we can share the wisdom of these times—studies in diversity—to educate ourselves and our com- munities in such a way that we can recognize and examine the received ideas, the implicit biases, that have stopped the flow of compassion and understanding. But be careful, though. Even our desire to open our minds, to find a teaching that enlightens us, can be a re-visiting of our old notions of accept- able and not acceptable. There’s a beloved Zen story about a monk who went to visit Joshu, an eminent Zen master of the time. Joshu got his name from Joshu province where he was living, where there was a world-famous single span stone bridge, the first of its kind in China. When the monk came to Joshu’s shabby little temple, he said, “I’ve heard of the Great Stone Bridge of Joshu but now that I’ve come here, I just see an old log bridge.” Joshu replied, “Oh, you only see the log bridge! You don’t see the Stone Bridge.” The monk replied, “So, what is the Stone Bridge?” And Joshu said, “It lets asses cross, it lets horses cross.” It’s the bridge that welcomes all. But the monk could not see that, blinded as he was by his idea of how Joshu and his temple should look. He could not see beyond his preconceptions, and he missed the profound teachings of this great teacher who compassionately allowed all manner of seekers— horses and asses! Hopefully, the monk eventually sat quietly enough to stop the noise in his mind, and finally benefited from the teachings of the old log bridge. Here, in this time, we can benefit from the work of many in the diversity field. We can find where it is we “stick” in terms of culture, skin color, abilities, sexual preference, and gender diversity. We can see how often we are imagining a stone bridge of whiteness, able-bodiedness, het- erosexuality, and gender normativity. In doing so, we miss the deep and profound teachings of dif- ference, of fireflies, and of log bridges. LION’S ROAR | MAY 2019 70